<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blogging about all things SAS &#187; Base SAS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.saasinct.com/tag/base-sas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.saasinct.com</link>
	<description>::       Sharing with the world everything we discover about SAS.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Making the move from Base SAS to Enterprise Guide (and please release DI Studio 4.2)</title>
		<link>http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/02/14/making-the-move-from-base-sas-to-enterprise-guide-and-please-release-di-studio-42/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=making-the-move-from-base-sas-to-enterprise-guide-and-please-release-di-studio-42</link>
		<comments>http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/02/14/making-the-move-from-base-sas-to-enterprise-guide-and-please-release-di-studio-42/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane Gibson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAS 9.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Base SAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DI Studio 4.2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sasinct.com/2009/02/14/making-the-move-from-base-sas-to-enterprise-guide-and-please-release-di-studio-42/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Hemedinger has blogged a number of very good reasons why you would move fomr Base SAS to Enterprise Guide. He has also outlined the things you will loose. In my experience most SAS programmers are forced by their cpmpanies to move to EG rather than do so willingly (but I amnot saying the move [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <span class="html_body_text">Chris Hemedinger has <a href="http://blogs.sas.com/sasdummy/index.php?/archives/76-SAS-Enterprise-Guide-for-SAS-programmers.html" target="_blank">blogged</a> a number of very good reasons why you would move fomr Base SAS to Enterprise Guide.  He has also outlined the things you will loose.</span></p>
<p>In my experience most SAS programmers are forced by their cpmpanies to move to EG rather than do so willingly (but I amnot saying the move is a wrong one).  There are a number of reasons that this move is enforced on them, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Reducing License costs, by moving from desktoplicenses to server ased licenses</li>
<li>Increased code reuse by non SAS programmers</li>
<li>Increased documentation, via EG&#8217;s semi self documenting features</li>
</ul>
<p>One of the area I find base SAS Programmers struggle with is the whole idea of Metadata vs Physical table data.  So I would recommend spending a bit of time on this with them.</p>
<p>At the moment we would love to move our DI Studio code to EG for one of our projects.  The reason?</p>
<p>In EG you can see the log file as the code run&#8217;s, in DI Studio you have to wait until it finishes (assuming it does finish).</p>
<p>DI Studio provides the ability to see where in the process flow your job is at, but for now we write our code in DI Studio, then grab it and run it in EG so we can keep up with what it is doing.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://blog.saasinct.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/02/14/making-the-move-from-base-sas-to-enterprise-guide-and-please-release-di-studio-42/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
