Comments on: SAS Administration http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/08/17/sas-administration/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sas-administration :: Sharing with the world everything we discover about SAS. Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:27:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Angela Hall http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/08/17/sas-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-307 Angela Hall Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:09:50 +0000 http://blog.sasinct.com/2009/08/17/sas-administration/#comment-307 Shane, Thanks for pointing out the v8 to v9 paradigm shift for users! I have also written a paper (SGF2009) about how to support a SAS Server Architecture. You can check out my SAS Community article at <a href="http://www.sascommunity.org/wiki/Supporting_a_SAS_Server_Architecture" rel="nofollow">http://www.sascommunity.org/wiki/Supporting_a_SAS_Server_Architecture</a>. ~ Angela Hall angela.hall@zencos.com Shane,
Thanks for pointing out the v8 to v9 paradigm shift for users! I have also written a paper (SGF2009) about how to support a SAS Server Architecture. You can check out my SAS Community article at http://www.sascommunity.org/wiki/Supporting_a_SAS_Server_Architecture.

~ Angela Hall
angela.hall@zencos.com

]]> By: Shane Gibson http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/08/17/sas-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-292 Shane Gibson Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:02:15 +0000 http://blog.sasinct.com/2009/08/17/sas-administration/#comment-292 Hi Robert It does look very similar and as both group of Authors work for Thotwave then I am guessing it is a rehash of the original paper. Thanks for pointing it out. Cheers Shane Hi Robert

It does look very similar and as both group of Authors work for Thotwave then I am guessing it is a rehash of the original paper.

Thanks for pointing it out.

Cheers
Shane

]]> By: Robert Meekings http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/08/17/sas-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-288 Robert Meekings Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:14:55 +0000 http://blog.sasinct.com/2009/08/17/sas-administration/#comment-288 I thought I recognised bits of this, it appears to build on paper 220 from the 2008 SGF (http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/forum2008/220-2008.pdf). Are there significant differences? I thought I recognised bits of this, it appears to build on paper 220 from the 2008 SGF (http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/forum2008/220-2008.pdf).

Are there significant differences?

]]>