<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAS 9.2 its getting close (isn&#8217;t it?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/02/10/sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/02/10/sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it</link>
	<description>::       Sharing with the world everything we discover about SAS.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: All roads lead to SAS 9.2, its almost here! &#124; Blogging about all things SAS</title>
		<link>http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/02/10/sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>All roads lead to SAS 9.2, its almost here! &#124; Blogging about all things SAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sasinct.com/2009/02/10/sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] added a comment to my previous blog that 9.2 was being released on the 28th [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] added a comment to my previous blog that 9.2 was being released on the 28th [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Gibson</title>
		<link>http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/02/10/sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sasinct.com/2009/02/10/sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Info.

We are running the NZ SAS Users Conference on the 27th, damn missed by a day (and a few timezones)

And yes heard that the 9.1 clients were not compatible with 9.2 environment so mandatory desktop upgrade, plus only XP and Vista is supported (and its surprising how many Windows 2000/NT client environments still exist)

Also heard that Portal Pages won&#039;t be migrated as part of the upgrade, now its a pain in the bum not being able to migrate themn from Dev &gt; UAT &gt; Prod at the moment, but losing them as part of the upgrade is diabolical (somebody from SAS please post that I am wrong here)

We have been planning to build a tool to migrate Portal content rolm Dev &gt; UAT &gt; Prod, but wanted to wait to see what was in 9.2.

Looks like it might be worth doing ti sooner than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Info.</p>
<p>We are running the NZ SAS Users Conference on the 27th, damn missed by a day (and a few timezones)</p>
<p>And yes heard that the 9.1 clients were not compatible with 9.2 environment so mandatory desktop upgrade, plus only XP and Vista is supported (and its surprising how many Windows 2000/NT client environments still exist)</p>
<p>Also heard that Portal Pages won&#8217;t be migrated as part of the upgrade, now its a pain in the bum not being able to migrate themn from Dev > UAT > Prod at the moment, but losing them as part of the upgrade is diabolical (somebody from SAS please post that I am wrong here)</p>
<p>We have been planning to build a tool to migrate Portal content rolm Dev > UAT > Prod, but wanted to wait to see what was in 9.2.</p>
<p>Looks like it might be worth doing ti sooner than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joebloe</title>
		<link>http://blog.saasinct.com/2009/02/10/sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>joebloe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sasinct.com/2009/02/10/sas-92-its-getting-close-isnt-it/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>unofficially - release is going to be Feb 28th.

we are planning to migrate, and as SAS platform manager in our organisation, I know how long/painful it will be.  We have a number of architectural changes to implement, but more significantly the metadata structure changes on the server, cause a requirement to release client software at the same time, and also we have to migrate 32bit SAS db&#039;s to 64bit versions.  Managing this through our server environments, and for a large user base will be non-trivial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unofficially &#8211; release is going to be Feb 28th.</p>
<p>we are planning to migrate, and as SAS platform manager in our organisation, I know how long/painful it will be.  We have a number of architectural changes to implement, but more significantly the metadata structure changes on the server, cause a requirement to release client software at the same time, and also we have to migrate 32bit SAS db&#8217;s to 64bit versions.  Managing this through our server environments, and for a large user base will be non-trivial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
