<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Value of SAS Enterprise Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.saasinct.com/2008/02/07/the-value-of-sas-enterprise-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.saasinct.com/2008/02/07/the-value-of-sas-enterprise-guide/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-value-of-sas-enterprise-guide</link>
	<description>::       Sharing with the world everything we discover about SAS.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Fleming</title>
		<link>http://blog.saasinct.com/2008/02/07/the-value-of-sas-enterprise-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sasinct.com/2008/02/07/the-value-of-sas-enterprise-guide/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>As the self-proclaimed &quot;SAS Geek&quot; (sans Uber - that&#039;s not for me to say), I will confirm that I do like DIS. Even possibly a lot. But I don&#039;t like EG - it slows me down.

When Assist was put out with v6.03 (or thereabouts), I tried it and immediately hated it. When the Query tool was being pushed along with 6.07 (?), I tried it and again immediately hated it.

For someone who is used to SAS (and this is a personal view, of course), SAS/Assist was too basic, and for someone who knew nothing about SAS it was still too advanced without their learning about basic concepts. I think by the time they did, it still wasn&#039;t up to scratch. The same goes for the Query tool, especially on a mainframe (where I first used it). There&#039;s too much pointing and clicking, and little or no way to do repeated processes.

EG is more advanced than either of these, naturally. But I still find that the interface gets in the way of what I want to do. I have always raged against MS/Access (quite rightly!), largely because it was almost invariably used wrongly, but also because the paradigm that it set up didn&#039;t map on to how I wanted to do stuff.

EG has a place, and a perfectly valid one. It&#039;s a relatively cheap way to roll SAS out across an enterprise, but there will always be stick-in-the-muds like me who want something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the self-proclaimed &#8220;SAS Geek&#8221; (sans Uber &#8211; that&#8217;s not for me to say), I will confirm that I do like DIS. Even possibly a lot. But I don&#8217;t like EG &#8211; it slows me down.</p>
<p>When Assist was put out with v6.03 (or thereabouts), I tried it and immediately hated it. When the Query tool was being pushed along with 6.07 (?), I tried it and again immediately hated it.</p>
<p>For someone who is used to SAS (and this is a personal view, of course), SAS/Assist was too basic, and for someone who knew nothing about SAS it was still too advanced without their learning about basic concepts. I think by the time they did, it still wasn&#8217;t up to scratch. The same goes for the Query tool, especially on a mainframe (where I first used it). There&#8217;s too much pointing and clicking, and little or no way to do repeated processes.</p>
<p>EG is more advanced than either of these, naturally. But I still find that the interface gets in the way of what I want to do. I have always raged against MS/Access (quite rightly!), largely because it was almost invariably used wrongly, but also because the paradigm that it set up didn&#8217;t map on to how I wanted to do stuff.</p>
<p>EG has a place, and a perfectly valid one. It&#8217;s a relatively cheap way to roll SAS out across an enterprise, but there will always be stick-in-the-muds like me who want something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
